-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 412
Closed
Labels
bugIssue/PR to expose/discuss/fix a bugIssue/PR to expose/discuss/fix a bugneeds-triageissue or PR has not been assigned a priority-px labelissue or PR has not been assigned a priority-px label
Description
Hi GPU Operator Team,
I noticed a potential discrepancy in the 0400_configmap.yaml regarding the MIG profiles for the NVIDIA HGX GB200 GPU.
File in question:
gpu-operator/assets/state-mig-manager/0400_configmap.yaml
Lines 359 to 366 in 456f414
| # GB200 HGX | |
| - device-filter: ["0x294110DE"] | |
| devices: all | |
| mig-enabled: true | |
| mig-devices: | |
| "1g.23gb": 2 | |
| "2g.47gb": 1 | |
| "3g.93gb": 1 |
Issue: The configuration specified at these lines appears to differ from the official documentation.
According to the v25.3.0 release notes, the correct all-balanced profile combination for the GB200 HGX should be:
1g.24gb: 2
2g.47gb: 1
3g.95gb: 1
Could you please verify if the 0400_configmap.yaml should be updated to align with the values listed in the release notes?
Thank you!
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
bugIssue/PR to expose/discuss/fix a bugIssue/PR to expose/discuss/fix a bugneeds-triageissue or PR has not been assigned a priority-px labelissue or PR has not been assigned a priority-px label