License situation of library should be mentioned on landing page of documentation

[behackl]

Title, basically.

I imagine one well-worded paragraph mentioning

• that the library (both the original as well as the community edition) are MIT licensed,
• that the code for Grant's videos (3b1b/videos) is open-source but copyrighted (in particular: Pi creatures are protected),
• that videos created with Manim are allowed (and actually even supposed) to be shared online; no attribution of Manim is required (just much appreciated)

would do the job. Help coming up with a suitable wording is very welcome!

[riyasunil]

Hey can this issue be assigned to me?

[behackl]

@riyasunil you are welcome to work on this, just send a PR; we don't really use issue assignments here. Let us know if you run into any problems!

[riyasunil]

alright thankyou ! 😊