exec /docker-entrypoint.sh: exec format error. ARM Support?

[binuengoor]

Was trying to run the project on docker on an arm64 machine and ran into the following issue:

exec ./celery-slow-entrypoint.sh: exec format error
exec /usr/local/bin/api-entrypoint.sh: exec format error
exec ./celery-fast-entrypoint.sh: exec format error
exec /docker-entrypoint.sh: exec format error

Server Specs:

Server:
 Containers: 11
  Running: 4
  Paused: 0
  Stopped: 7
 Images: 9
 Server Version: 23.0.0
 Storage Driver: overlay2
  Backing Filesystem: extfs
  Supports d_type: true
  Using metacopy: false
  Native Overlay Diff: true
  userxattr: false
 Logging Driver: json-file
 Cgroup Driver: systemd
 Cgroup Version: 2
 Plugins:
  Volume: local
  Network: bridge host ipvlan macvlan null overlay
  Log: awslogs fluentd gcplogs gelf journald json-file local logentries splunk syslog
 Swarm: inactive
 Runtimes: io.containerd.runc.v2 runc
 Default Runtime: runc
 Init Binary: docker-init
 containerd version: 31aa4358a36870b21a992d3ad2bef29e1d693bec
 runc version: v1.1.4-0-g5fd4c4d
 init version: de40ad0
 Security Options:
  apparmor
  seccomp
   Profile: builtin
  cgroupns
 Kernel Version: 5.15.0-1017-oracle
 Operating System: Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS
 OSType: linux
 Architecture: aarch64
 CPUs: 4
 Total Memory: 23.43GiB
 Name: instance-20220906-1534
 ID: UPVQ:TUFK:N5GB:P3LP:EHZO:LQOW:EROY:PXM6:46MN:LL5S:FGSD:TVQW
 Docker Root Dir: /var/lib/docker
 Debug Mode: false
 Registry: https://index.docker.io/v1/
 Experimental: false
 Insecure Registries:
  127.0.0.0/8
 Live Restore Enabled: false

I am very new to this. Is arm64 architecture not supported? Any possibility of adding support in the near future?

[JeffreyCA]

Can you try building the images from source using up --build or build? The prebuilt images target amd64 I believe. I can look into how to support multiple architectures.

[binuengoor]

I ran the following and it did not make any difference. When I checked the images in portainer, it said amd64. So maybe its not building to the correct architecture with the following code and directly pulling from docker-hub? Am I doing this correctly? Thanks for your help.

docker-compose -f docker-compose.yml -f docker-compose.prod.yml -f docker-compose.prod.selfhost.yml up --build

[JeffreyCA]

Does this work?

docker-compose -f docker-compose.yml -f docker-compose.prod.yml -f docker-compose.prod.selfhost.yml -f docker-compose.build.yml build

I think it might fail because certain dependencies used like nnabla 1.26.0 do not support ARM64. Looks like newer versions support it but only on Python 3.9+ (the prebuilt images use Python 3.8).

[binuengoor]

That is correct.

Errored out
=> ERROR [jeffreyca/spleeter-web-backend:latest 6/9] RUN pip install --upgrade pip wheel && pip install -r requirements.txt

#0 10.75 ERROR: Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement nnabla==1.26.0 (from versions: none)
#0 10.75 ERROR: No matching distribution found for nnabla==1.26.0

What to do now?

[JeffreyCA]

Unfortunately there isn't a workaround at the moment

[binuengoor]

Unfortunately there isn't a workaround at the moment

Well, thanks for looking into it. Hope some day it will be possible to have ARM support too. I will keep my eyes peeled. Thanks for your amazing work.

[binuengoor]

@JeffreyCA any updates to this issue? Was the image versions updated to add arm support?

[JeffreyCA]

@binuengoor Sorry for the long turnaround, I didn't have a ARM device to easily test things. I just merged some fixes to support ARM in #930. Can you try the latest changes?

[microtherion]

FWIW, I'm running on an arm64 machine, and it works well.