You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This discussion proposes a guardrail-first design Module for challenges where:
-Each level defines both challenge logic and allowed attack surface
-Platform abuse is explicitly constrained without reducing realism
-Isolation boundaries evolve with difficulty
Few Questions to be discussed
1.How much realism is worth the added isolation cost as currently the platform is self deployable?
2.How do we standardize guardrail policies across different challenge types ? What telemetry is most useful for detecting platform abuse in real time?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
This discussion proposes a guardrail-first design Module for challenges where:
-Each level defines both challenge logic and allowed attack surface
-Platform abuse is explicitly constrained without reducing realism
-Isolation boundaries evolve with difficulty
Few Questions to be discussed
1.How much realism is worth the added isolation cost as currently the platform is self deployable?
2.How do we standardize guardrail policies across different challenge types ? What telemetry is most useful for detecting platform abuse in real time?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions