Question on OpenSpec Command Support in IDE Tools: Why are Extended Commands (e.g., /opsx:ff) Less Prevalent Than Core Commands? #905
yhwelcome1981-debug
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello everyone,
I have a question regarding OpenSpec command support that I'd like to discuss. I've noticed that in IDE integration tools like CodeBuddy, we typically only have access to basic OpenSpec core commands (e.g., /opsx:propose, /opsx:apply, /opsx:archive). However, extended workflow commands, such as /opsx:ff, don't seem to be consistently supported or recognized by default. According to OpenSpec documentation, /opsx:ff is part of the expanded workflow commands, designed to "create all planning artifacts at once" (Fast-forward: create all planning artifacts at once), which is similar to /opsx:propose but potentially covers a broader scope of artifact generation.
I'm curious about the reasons behind this. Is it due to:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions