-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathcorrelation_results.txt
More file actions
136 lines (122 loc) · 7.55 KB
/
correlation_results.txt
File metadata and controls
136 lines (122 loc) · 7.55 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
======================================================================
NYC INCIDENT CORRELATION ANALYSIS
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[!!] STRONG CORRELATIONS (ratio > 2.0x)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Noise (Residential) <-> Rodent Activity: 16.7x correlation
Data: 2000 Noise (Residential) points, 1993 Rodent Activity points
Avg Rodent Activity within 0.25 km of Noise (Residential): 1.90
Avg Rodent Activity within 0.25 km of random point: 0.11
By distance:
0.1 km: actual=0.38, random=0.01, ratio=37.8x
0.25 km: actual=1.90, random=0.11, ratio=16.7x
0.5 km: actual=7.00, random=0.59, ratio=11.8x
1.0 km: actual=25.13, random=2.86, ratio=8.8x
-> FINDING: Noise complaint hotspots overlap with rodent activity — may indicate building maintenance issues.
Rodent Activity <-> Housing Violations (Class C): 13.4x correlation
Data: 1993 Rodent Activity points, 2000 Housing Violations (Class C) points
Avg Housing Violations (Class C) within 0.25 km of Rodent Activity: 2.57
Avg Housing Violations (Class C) within 0.25 km of random point: 0.19
By distance:
0.1 km: actual=0.48, random=0.01, ratio=39.7x
0.25 km: actual=2.57, random=0.19, ratio=13.4x
0.5 km: actual=8.91, random=0.85, ratio=10.4x
1.0 km: actual=28.97, random=3.56, ratio=8.1x
-> FINDING: Rat activity clusters near buildings with serious housing violations — coordinated inspections recommended.
Noise (Residential) <-> Housing Violations (Class C): 11.2x correlation
Data: 2000 Noise (Residential) points, 2000 Housing Violations (Class C) points
Avg Housing Violations (Class C) within 0.25 km of Noise (Residential): 2.14
Avg Housing Violations (Class C) within 0.25 km of random point: 0.19
By distance:
0.1 km: actual=0.41, random=0.01, ratio=34.2x
0.25 km: actual=2.14, random=0.19, ratio=11.2x
0.5 km: actual=6.80, random=0.85, ratio=8.0x
1.0 km: actual=27.13, random=3.56, ratio=7.6x
-> FINDING: Noise complaints cluster near Class C housing violations — both signal distressed buildings.
Vehicle Crashes <-> Rodent Activity: 9.3x correlation
Data: 1950 Vehicle Crashes points, 1993 Rodent Activity points
Avg Rodent Activity within 0.25 km of Vehicle Crashes: 1.06
Avg Rodent Activity within 0.25 km of random point: 0.11
By distance:
0.1 km: actual=0.17, random=0.01, ratio=17.2x
0.25 km: actual=1.06, random=0.11, ratio=9.3x
0.5 km: actual=4.56, random=0.59, ratio=7.7x
1.0 km: actual=18.14, random=2.86, ratio=6.3x
-> FINDING: Crashes and rodent sightings cluster in the same neighborhoods — dense urban corridors.
Sewer/Flooding <-> Rodent Activity: 6.9x correlation
Data: 2000 Sewer/Flooding points, 1993 Rodent Activity points
Avg Rodent Activity within 0.25 km of Sewer/Flooding: 0.79
Avg Rodent Activity within 0.25 km of random point: 0.11
By distance:
0.1 km: actual=0.13, random=0.01, ratio=13.2x
0.25 km: actual=0.79, random=0.11, ratio=6.9x
0.5 km: actual=3.15, random=0.59, ratio=5.3x
1.0 km: actual=11.34, random=2.86, ratio=4.0x
-> FINDING: Sewer issues attract rodent activity — fixing drainage may reduce pest problems.
Vehicle Crashes <-> Noise (Residential): 6.1x correlation
Data: 1950 Vehicle Crashes points, 2000 Noise (Residential) points
Avg Noise (Residential) within 0.25 km of Vehicle Crashes: 1.23
Avg Noise (Residential) within 0.25 km of random point: 0.20
By distance:
0.1 km: actual=0.23, random=0.04, ratio=6.1x
0.25 km: actual=1.23, random=0.20, ratio=6.1x
0.5 km: actual=4.16, random=0.72, ratio=5.8x
1.0 km: actual=13.62, random=3.28, ratio=4.1x
-> FINDING: Crash-prone areas generate noise complaints — likely high-traffic, high-density zones.
Potholes <-> Sewer/Flooding: 3.7x correlation
Data: 2000 Potholes points, 2000 Sewer/Flooding points
Avg Sewer/Flooding within 0.25 km of Potholes: 0.65
Avg Sewer/Flooding within 0.25 km of random point: 0.18
By distance:
0.1 km: actual=0.17, random=0.04, ratio=4.7x
0.25 km: actual=0.65, random=0.18, ratio=3.7x
0.5 km: actual=2.64, random=0.74, ratio=3.6x
1.0 km: actual=9.93, random=2.76, ratio=3.6x
-> FINDING: Potholes and sewer issues co-occur — shared root cause of aging infrastructure.
Sewer/Flooding <-> Housing Violations (Class C): 3.5x correlation
Data: 2000 Sewer/Flooding points, 2000 Housing Violations (Class C) points
Avg Housing Violations (Class C) within 0.25 km of Sewer/Flooding: 0.67
Avg Housing Violations (Class C) within 0.25 km of random point: 0.19
By distance:
0.1 km: actual=0.09, random=0.01, ratio=7.2x
0.25 km: actual=0.67, random=0.19, ratio=3.5x
0.5 km: actual=2.71, random=0.85, ratio=3.2x
1.0 km: actual=10.52, random=3.56, ratio=3.0x
-> FINDING: Sewer/flooding reports near housing violations suggest infrastructure-linked building deterioration.
Potholes <-> Vehicle Crashes: 3.2x correlation
Data: 2000 Potholes points, 1950 Vehicle Crashes points
Avg Vehicle Crashes within 0.25 km of Potholes: 0.66
Avg Vehicle Crashes within 0.25 km of random point: 0.21
By distance:
0.1 km: actual=0.15, random=0.04, ratio=3.5x
0.25 km: actual=0.66, random=0.21, ratio=3.2x
0.5 km: actual=2.51, random=0.79, ratio=3.2x
1.0 km: actual=9.22, random=2.89, ratio=3.2x
-> FINDING: Areas with pothole clusters should be flagged for traffic safety — crashes concentrate near road damage.
Potholes <-> Noise (Residential): 2.4x correlation
Data: 2000 Potholes points, 2000 Noise (Residential) points
Avg Noise (Residential) within 0.25 km of Potholes: 0.49
Avg Noise (Residential) within 0.25 km of random point: 0.20
By distance:
0.1 km: actual=0.07, random=0.04, ratio=1.9x
0.25 km: actual=0.49, random=0.20, ratio=2.4x
0.5 km: actual=2.18, random=0.72, ratio=3.0x
1.0 km: actual=9.69, random=3.28, ratio=3.0x
-> FINDING: Pothole-heavy areas also generate noise complaints — possible construction or traffic congestion link.
======================================================================
KEY INSIGHTS FOR DISPATCHERS
======================================================================
1. Noise complaint hotspots overlap with rodent activity — may indicate building maintenance issues.
2. Rat activity clusters near buildings with serious housing violations — coordinated inspections recommended.
3. Noise complaints cluster near Class C housing violations — both signal distressed buildings.
4. Crashes and rodent sightings cluster in the same neighborhoods — dense urban corridors.
5. Sewer issues attract rodent activity — fixing drainage may reduce pest problems.
6. Crash-prone areas generate noise complaints — likely high-traffic, high-density zones.
7. Potholes and sewer issues co-occur — shared root cause of aging infrastructure.
8. Sewer/flooding reports near housing violations suggest infrastructure-linked building deterioration.
9. Areas with pothole clusters should be flagged for traffic safety — crashes concentrate near road damage.
10. Pothole-heavy areas also generate noise complaints — possible construction or traffic congestion link.
======================================================================
Analysis complete. 10 pairs evaluated.
======================================================================