Expected to return JSON but returning string

[vnydv]

Problem:

The localStorage ("recover") is double stringified causing the recover circuit to always show untitled

Fixed:

The function signature mentioned returning JSON but string was sent. Removed the unnessary conversion before return

Further note:

Same issue in v1, @maintainers please change there also

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Streamlined save handling by returning structured data directly instead of a serialized string.
  • Improves consistency of save operations and reduces unnecessary processing, with no changes to the visible save flow.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for circuitverse ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	45ac2c9
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/circuitverse/deploys/68d7c88ae695c40008804743
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-658--circuitverse.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse	1 paths audited Performance: 39 (🔴 down 6 from production) Accessibility: 73 (no change from production) Best Practices: 92 (no change from production) SEO: 82 (no change from production) PWA: - View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

generateSaveData in v0/src/simulator/src/data/save.js now returns the aggregated save data object directly instead of a JSON string. The serialization step (JSON conversion) was removed. No other logic or exported declarations were modified.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary of edits
Save data serialization removal v0/src/simulator/src/data/save.js	Removed JSON stringification; generateSaveData now returns the data object, changing return type from string to object.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the discrepancy between expected JSON and actual string return, which is the main change in the pull request. It succinctly summarizes the bug being fixed without unnecessary detail, allowing team members scanning history to grasp the primary purpose of the changeset. Although it could specify the affected function for extra clarity, it remains sufficiently specific and relevant.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0921d26 and 45ac2c9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• v0/src/simulator/src/data/save.js (0 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• v0/src/simulator/src/data/save.js

Tip

👮 Agentic pre-merge checks are now available in preview!

Pro plan users can now enable pre-merge checks in their settings to enforce checklists before merging PRs.

• Built-in checks – Quickly apply ready-made checks to enforce title conventions, require pull request descriptions that follow templates, validate linked issues for compliance, and more.
• Custom agentic checks – Define your own rules using CodeRabbit’s advanced agentic capabilities to enforce organization-specific policies and workflows. For example, you can instruct CodeRabbit’s agent to verify that API documentation is updated whenever API schema files are modified in a PR. Note: Upto 5 custom checks are currently allowed during the preview period. Pricing for this feature will be announced in a few weeks.

Please see the documentation for more information.

Example:

reviews:
  pre_merge_checks:
    custom_checks:
      - name: "Undocumented Breaking Changes"
        mode: "warning"
        instructions: |
          Pass/fail criteria: All breaking changes to public APIs, CLI flags, environment variables, configuration keys, database schemas, or HTTP/GraphQL endpoints must be documented in the "Breaking Change" section of the PR description and in CHANGELOG.md. Exclude purely internal or private changes (e.g., code not exported from package entry points or explicitly marked as internal).

Please share your feedback with us on this Discord post.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[aryanndwi123]

Hey @vnydv , thanks for catching that! Once we’ve stabilized the current version, we’ll sync the changes to v1.